Smallest-ever fossil dinosaur found trapped in amber

The little bird-like dinosaur Oculudentavis khaungraae probably dined on insects in a Cretaceous rainforest.

By Michael Greshko
Published 12 Mar 2020, 06:00 GMT
A piece of amber less than 1.5 inches wide contains the entire skull of Oculudentavis khaungraae, ...
A piece of amber less than 1.5 inches wide contains the entire skull of Oculudentavis khaungraae, a newfound type of dinosaur that lived in what is now Myanmar 99 million years ago.
Photograph by Xing Lida

Editor’s Note: On July 22, 2020, the original study describing Oculudentavis was retracted from the scientific journal Nature by the study’s authors to "prevent inaccurate information from remaining in the literature." In a notice published on Nature’s website, the researchers write that although the fossil—a skull encased in amber—was described accurately, "a new unpublished [fossil] specimen casts doubts upon our hypothesis" that the skull came from a dinosaur. Since the study’s publication, some outside palaeontologists have argued that the fossil may instead belong to a lizard, though this interpretation has yet to be peer-reviewed.

A spectacular new amber fossil from Myanmar holds the skull of the smallest prehistoric dinosaur ever found: a bird-like creature that lived 99 million years ago and grew no bigger than the smallest birds alive today.

The fossil, described today in the journal Nature, measures just 1.5 centimetres long from the back of the head to the tip of the snout – about the width of a thumbnail. The skull's proportions suggest that the animal was about the same size as a bee hummingbird, which would have made the newfound dinosaur lighter than a 5p piece.

The tiny creature appears to be most closely related to the feathered dinosaurs Archaeopteryx and Jeholornis, distant cousins of modern birds. Researchers suspect that like those animals, the small dinosaur had feathery wings, but without more fossils, they can't determine how well it flew. And despite its hummingbird-like proportions, the tiny dinosaur was no nectar feeder. Its upper jaw bristled with 40 sharp teeth, and its huge eyes—suited for spotting prey in the foliage—have features unlike any seen in other dinosaurs. Fittingly, the creature’s genus name is Oculudentavis, derived from the Latin words for eye, tooth, and bird.

No creature alive today is built quite like Oculudentavis. “It’s revealing a completely different ecological niche that we never knew existed,” says study coauthor Jingmai O’Connor, a paleontologist at China’s Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology. “It’s fun, but it’s also a total puzzle, and everything about it is so weird.”

“This is truly one of the rarest and most spectacular of finds!” University of Central Florida paleontologist Ryan Carney, who wasn’t involved with the study, says in an email. “Like capturing Cretaceous lightning in a bottle, this amber preserves an unprecedented snapshot of a miniature dinosaur skull with exciting new features.”

A snout of sharp teeth

When Lida Xing first saw the fossil, he thought it was “too strange.” The paleontologist at the Chinese University of Geosciences and lead author of the new study thought the animal’s long snout and large eyes suggested it was an early bird. But Xing was surprised that it had so many teeth, seemingly more than any other toothed bird from the Cretaceous. A full 23 teeth, each less than half a millimetre long, stud the creature’s upper right jaw alone.

To get a better look at the skull, Xing took the lump of amber to a high-powered x-ray facility in Shanghai to capture features as tiny as the width of a red blood cell. He then sent the scans to O’Connor, a specialist in bird-related dinosaurs, and what she saw gobsmacked her.

“This [fossil] was so pristine and so well-preserved,” O’Connor says. “This thing was super perfect.”

To suss out the dinosaur’s relative age, O’Connor and her colleagues pored over scans of the skull and looked at how much its bones had fused together, an indication of the animal’s maturity. The researchers determined that Oculudentavis died at or near adulthood—making its petite size all the more unusual.

Eyes like no other bird

The unusual creature also had eyes so large, they would have bulged out of the sides of its head. Puzzled, O’Connor decided to contact palaeontology’s “eye guy,” Lars Schmitz, a researcher at California’s W.M. Keck Science Department who studies the evolution of vision.

When Schmitz first saw the skull scans, he realised that the eyes resembled smaller birds’ proportionately large eyes, which strengthened the case that the Oculudentavis fossil came from an adult.

Reptiles and birds have small bony rings in their eyes that help support the visual organs. The plates comprising these rings are usually shaped like narrow rectangles, but in Oculudentavis, the tiny bones are shaped like ice cream scoops. “The shape you see there, that isn’t really seen in any other bird, or any other dinosaur,” Schmitz says.

The only animals today with similarly scoop-shaped eye bones are diurnal lizards. As far as the researchers can tell, Oculudentavis used its unusually large eyes to forage during the day, snapping up insects with its toothed snout.

The most similar bird today might be the tody, a small-bodied Caribbean bird that preys on insects, says Jen Bright, a biologist and bird skull specialist at the University of Hull. But tody skulls are twice the size of the Oculudentavis fossil. “To find a vertebrate fossil this small is kind of mind-blowing,” she says. “It’s such a weirdo, I love it!”

O’Connor speculates that Oculudentavis’s strange features may have developed in its unique prehistoric environment. In ecosystems with limited resources such as islands, evolution can push animals to miniaturise, and the remains of a marine creature called an ammonite suggest the Burmese amber deposits formed on islands, or at least on coastlines.

“The tiniest vertebrates alive right now are these tiny little frogs from Madagascar, and they’re predatory, the same way we hypothesise that Oculudentavis was,” O’Connor says.

Digging up fossils—and controversy

Oculudentavis first came to light in 2016, when Burmese amber collector Khaung Ra acquired two specimens from a mine, including the tiny, mysterious skull. Ra donated the fossil to the Hupoge Amber Museum in Tengchong, China, which Ra’s son-in-law Guang Chen directs. The dinosaur’s species name, khaungraae, honours Ra’s donation.

The fossil is the latest discovery from the amber mines of northern Myanmar, whose caches of fossilised tree resin hold the remains of the tiniest denizens of an ancient rainforest. In recent years, palaeontologists have found insects, a snake, and even some remains of feathered dinosaurs entombed within the amber. No scientist has done more to catalogue these amber fossils than Xing, whose research is partially funded by the National Geographic Society.

As Burmese amber’s scientific value grows, so too do ethical concerns around its study. Many significant amber fossils start out in the hands of private collectors, raising questions about future scientists’ access to the specimens. Miners also face unsafe conditions, and the mines lie within Myanmar’s Kachin state, home to a long-simmering conflict between the Myanmar military and rebels fighting for Kachin independence. A 2018 military offensive to take over the mining areas displaced thousands of indigenous Kachin, according to the Kachin Development Networking Group.

According to Xing, the Hupoge Amber Museum is working to establish a museum in Myanmar, and Xing and other researchers are trying to ensure scientific access to amber specimens by returning them to the country once conflict in the region dies down. “It is the best thing to leave the important amber [fossils] in the country [where] they were found,” he says in an email.

As work continues to return Myanmar’s amber pieces, scientists will remain on the lookout for more bits of Oculudentavis. Already, Xing has heard rumours of a missed connection. The amber holding the Oculudentavis skull reportedly came from a bigger lump with preserved feathers, but by the time Xing saw the remains, the two pieces had been separated, cut, and polished, preventing him from confirming they came from the same source.

Schmitz, for one, is enchanted by the possibility. “Oh, I can’t even describe it!” he says. “The skull is so odd ... who knows what else we’ll learn in addition to what we’ve described so far?”


Explore Nat Geo

  • Animals
  • Environment
  • History & Culture
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Photography
  • Space
  • Adventure
  • Video

About us


  • Magazines
  • Disney+

Follow us

Copyright © 1996-2015 National Geographic Society. Copyright © 2015-2023 National Geographic Partners, LLC. All rights reserved